soft tissue therapy .com.au
Manual Therapy Conferences and Workshops Massage, Soft Tissue Therapy & Myotherapy Australia- Jobs & rooms for rent
Soft Tissue Therapy Facebook Page Manual therapy equipment for sale
soft tissue therapy .com.au
MENU

HOME RESEARCH ARTICLES GENERAL ARTICLES SEARCH ARTICLES STT eMAG FORUM LATEST POLL CALENDAR OF EVENTS DEFINITIONS ABBREVIATIONS LINKS MY FOLDER CONTACT US STT SHOP


MAILING LIST

For up to date info, workshops, new research articles, jobs, sale items, join our mailing list!



soft tissue therapy .com.au

ARTICLE soft tissue therapy .com.au

soft tissue therapy .com.au

Title
Paraspinal stimulation combined with trigger point needling and needle rotation for the treatment of myofascial pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.

Author(s)
Couto C1, de Souza IC, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W.

Published
Mar, 2014

Published In
Clin J Pain. 2014 Mar;30(3):214-23

Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are different types and parameters of dry needling (DN) that can affect its efficacy in the treatment of pain that have not been assessed properly. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that either multiple deep intramuscular stimulation therapy multiple deep intramuscular stimulation therapy (MDIMST) or TrP lidocaine injection (LTrP-I) is more effective than a placebo-sham for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and that MDIMST is more effective than LTrP-I for improving pain relief, sleep quality, and the physical and mental state of the patient. METHODS: Seventy-eight females aged 20 to 40 who were limited in their ability to perform active and routine activities due to MPS in the previous 3 months were recruited. The participants were randomized into 1 of the 3 groups as follows: placebo-sham, LTrP-I, or MDIMST. The treatments were provided twice weekly over 4 weeks using standardized MDIMST and LTrP-I protocols. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction (time vs. group) for the main outcomes. Compared with the sham-treated group, MDIMST and LTrP-I administration improved pain scores based on a visual analog scale, the pain pressure threshold (P<0.001 for all analyses), and analgesic use (P<0.01 for all analyses). In addition, when comparing the active groups for these outcomes, MDIMST resulted in better improvement than LTrP-I (P<0.01 for all analyses). In addition, both active treatments had a clinical effect, as assessed by a sleep diary and by the SF-12 physical and mental health scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the greater efficacy of MDIMST over the placebo-sham and LTrP-I and indicated that both active treatments are more effective than placebo-sham for MPS associated with limitations in active and routine activities.

Further Information   |   Add To My Folder   |   Printable Version

 

SPONSORED LINKS

Portable Thoracic Rack

Sports massage magazine for soft tissue therapists


soft tissue therapy .com.au